doug percy jerry thompson

Jerry is related to Virginia Ann Thompson . For this reason, it has long been established that prospective jurors are not to know of prior convictions until the penalty phase. Without explanation, the trial court ruled that the conviction was admissible. They have also lived in Phippsburg, ME and Beverly, MA. Join Facebook to connect with Jerry Thompson and others you may know. "See footnote 8 These witnesses actually added to Percy's account, rather than merely corroborating it, because Percy testified only that he assumed Thompson had shot Crandall in the head. The allegedly corroborative evidence here was irrelevant. Doug Percy - Address & Phone Number | Whitepages 2056, 23 L.Ed.2d 707 (1969). Percy testified that Thompson "shot" Crandall. D. Closing arguments The State lauded Percy in its closing argument as the man who helped solve both the Indianapolis killings at issue here and Crandall's murder a month earlier: [I]n the process of telling the Police Department and other Law Enforcement. The trial court began the voir dire, before any questioning had occurred, by reading both the charging information and the death penalty information to all prospective jurors. The rules of evidence require courts to guard against exploitation of those details. I don't think [Rule] 404 precludes the obtaining of the weapon, so the State will be allowed to introduce evidence of the obtaining of the weapon. In sum, the parties and the court concluded before trial that Thompson's access to the murder weapon was relevant to proving that he was the killer. A. Thompson and Percy each grabbed a large trash bag and drove back to Indianapolis. The identity exception to the general prohibition on propensity evidence is crafted primarily for signature crimes with a common modus operandi. His testimony was an essential element in the chain of evidence pointing to Thompson as the killer. However, the details of the killing, including the cause of death "as being two gunshot wounds in the head," id. If there is one lesson to take from this case, it is that Thompson's questioning Percy's, credibility did not open a door through which all evidence related to the Crandall murder could automatically pass. In any event, as explained in Part III infra, Featheringill's testimony was not relevant to the material fact of Thompson's access to the murder weapon and therefore should not have been admitted.

Alternative Careers For Physical Therapist Assistants, Brad Park Wife, Articles D

Brak możliwości komentowania